It’s a shift in practice. In our white paper dedicated to the five steps of virtual reality integration, step 4, “training the trainers,” is the most decisive. Without upskilling training teams, even the best tools turn into gadgets. Conversely, when trainers understand how to align technology with pedagogical goals, value appears quickly: better execution of skills, better understanding of mistakes, more engaged learners, and ultimately, skills that truly transfer to the field.
This article deliberately broadens the perspective. Yes, VR plays a central role in educational innovation, but most organizations rely on a much wider ecosystem: simulators, presentation software like PowerPoint or Canva, video capture studios, LMS, and generative AI tools. Training trainers today means enabling them to navigate this ecosystem smoothly and to choose, for each session, the right tool for the right goal.
Stop Choosing the Tool: Set the Learning Objective… and Gain Impact
The first shift is mental. You don’t teach “with a headset” or “with PowerPoint”; you teach a behavior, a procedure, a line of reasoning. The fundamental question becomes: what exact learning do we want to trigger, and which environment will allow the learner to achieve it most reliably? For a rare or risky gesture, a VR scenario that allows trial and error without danger is ideal. For decision-making, an interactive video with freeze-frame pauses may be more suitable. For quick refreshers of declarative knowledge, a short module with quizzes may be enough. This agility in choosing doesn’t happen by chance—it’s cultivated through training and repeated real facilitation practice.
Training trainers therefore begins with enriching their conceptual toolbox. It includes defining measurable objectives, scripting micro-sequences, mastering the art of concise and useful feedback, and aligning activities with meaningful assessments. Regardless of the technology, these fundamentals serve as the compass.
The 4-Step Method to Make Your Trainers Autonomous (and Confident)
In organizations where pedagogical transformation succeeds, the same four-step process is observed:
-
Demystification – A short, concrete time where the benefits and limits of technologies are clarified, use cases are shown, and what changes (and doesn’t change) is made explicit.
-
Hands-on practice – The goal is not to turn trainers into technicians but to give them calm autonomy: starting a headset, checking an account, launching a module, adjusting interpupillary distance, guiding a hesitant learner, documenting common glitches. This stage removes much of the apprehension.
-
Design – Moving from “I can use it” to “I can design a session.” Trainers write a complete scenario—from briefing to evaluation—choose progression, anticipate probable mistakes, and prepare a structured debrief. It’s also here they learn to use tool-generated data: completion times, recurring errors, success traces.
-
Anchoring practices – Without community, innovation fades. Successful teams hold regular feedback sessions, share tested scenarios, welcome new trainers with proven starter kits, and schedule practice reviews.
Leading an Immersive Session: The Skill That Changes Everything
The best technology will never make up for hesitant facilitation. An effective session opens with a clear brief: the objective, the rules of engagement, and how success will be measured. During the activity, the trainer circulates, observes, reformulates, offers short demonstrations, and steps in at the right time to verbalize what has just been learned. The debrief is not just a roundtable ; it’s the moment where the experience is connected to reality, reference points are reinforced, and an action plan is set.
As for technical aspects, they should be invisible to learners. Everything happens upstream: updates done, batteries charged, equipment ready, a plan B available. This “technical hygiene” is no detail—it protects learning time and the trainer’s pedagogical authority. Many organizations benefit from appointing a tech lead to standardize configurations, centralize solutions, and maintain an incident log. This prevents trainers from reinventing the wheel and greatly reduces downtime.
Comfort, Accessibility, Motion Sickness: Engage without leaving anyone behind
Training with technology also means paying attention to people. Some learners are prone to motion sickness, others begin with anxiety. Precise comfort settings, short sessions, gradual progression, and the ability to pause help everyone move at their own pace. Accessibility goes beyond VR: subtitling videos, offering alternatives to all-digital, and doubling key instructions in both written and spoken form—these simple gestures broaden access to training without diluting it.
Measuring what really matters: Learning, Transfer, and Engagement
The goal isn’t to accumulate spreadsheets but to track a few indicators that truly guide action. Three families are enough to start:
-
Learning outcomes – mastery criteria, fewer typical mistakes, shorter completion times.
-
Transfer to the field – faster autonomy, fewer incidents, more consistent quality.
-
Training experience – engagement, willingness to repeat, perceived usefulness.
When shared within the team and reinjected into future sessions, these insights create a powerful cycle of continuous improvement.
VR, Simulators, PowerPoint, AI: Which tool for which goal?
You might think PowerPoint belongs to the “old world.” In reality, a good deck can be a powerful activity guide: structuring sessions, pacing discussions, offering decisions, embedding links to simulations, and preparing debriefs. Video, when scripted with decision points, sharpens judgment. Simulators allow technical repetition without overloading attention. VR places the learner inside the situation, offering safe trial and error and rich immediate feedback. Generative AI completes the mix by providing case variations, debrief materials, and exercise ideas. The trainer’s role is to choose and combine these elements to serve a clear goal—not to oppose the tools.
Governance and Roles: Building an organization that avoids the “Gadget Effect”
Governance is often an afterthought. Yet it determines long-term sustainability. A tech lead / pedagogy lead pair clarifies who decides what. Leadership and HR must recognize techno-pedagogical competence, allocate time for it, and value it in career paths. A simple roadmap—3, 6, 12 months, with achievable milestones—is enough to stay on track. And above all, victories must be shared: a gesture better mastered, errors halved, a learner feeling ready earlier. Such tangible evidence convinces far more than promises.
Field FAQ: The questions your teams (and AIs) really ask
-
Does VR “do better” than other modalities? It excels when experience matters: safety, risk procedures, rare environments. For simple knowledge, other formats can work just as well in less time.
-
How to avoid discomfort in immersion? Careful adjustments, short sessions, gradual progression.
-
What if technology fails? Keep the session running thanks to a plan B, then document the incident to prevent recurrence.
-
How to convince a skeptical team? With local, measured proof: a short workshop, a tangible indicator, learner feedback.
-
What about data? Collect sparingly, use explicitly for learning benefits, and handle within the regulatory framework.
How we support teams—Without making technology an end in itself
For those seeking a concrete framework, we’ve structured an online course: “How to Use Virtual Reality in Training?” It first clarifies the role of digital in learning, then covers immersive tech, how to support beginner users, and explores recent pedagogical approaches to successfully apply VR in class or workshop. The format is 100% online. A VR headset is required; a MIMBUS DISCOVER license is provided for 30 days of real practice. For reference, the current price is €150 instead of €250 until October 30. The aim is not to replace face-to-face workshops or practice communities, but to feed them, structure them, and accelerate skill-building.
Start small, Prove fast, Grow sustainably
Training trainers isn’t a box to tick before moving on—it’s a continuous investment that blends technology, pedagogy, and culture. Where taken seriously, technology stops being decorative and becomes a true learning environment: a space to make mistakes, to progress quickly, to transfer skills effectively. Where neglected, equipment ages unused and new projects stall. The difference often comes down to a few organizational choices, careful attention to detail, and the ability to tell the story of improvement.
We are finalizing a second white paper: “Evaluating the Effectiveness of a VR Simulator: 5 Indicators.” It provides a clear, actionable method to check whether your scenarios deliver expected results: which signals to track, how to measure without adding heavy prep, and how to interpret results to decide, improve, expand, or pivot.
While waiting for its release, if you’re just starting out: set a clear objective, design a short scenario, choose one key indicator… then share what changes in the field. That’s how transformation takes root—and lasts.
To keep yourself informed, click here!
